Patient login for telemedicine and digital health

Health services need strong authentication, and today that means a different national scheme per market. A bank-ID provider here, a national eID there, a smart card somewhere else. Each one is a bespoke integration with its own contract and its own outage pattern, and entering a new country means doing it again.

01

One integration instead of one per member state

02

Patients from other countries authenticate without a workaround

03

Request only what is clinically necessary, which is the GDPR position anyway

Is this strong enough for health records?

eIDAS 2.0 places wallet authentication at the high assurance level, which is the tier national health services already require for record access. Device binding and holder consent are part of the protocol rather than bolted on afterwards.

Can we keep our national eID login?

Yes, and you should during the transition. Run wallet login as an extra option and move traffic across as coverage grows in each market.

What about health-specific identifiers?

Sector credentials such as a national insurance or health card number can be requested alongside identity attributes where the issuer supports them, so the login can carry the entitlement your clinical system needs.

Built on Authbound Identity Verification. One API key covers every flow you add later.